All posts by aaronjhill

Born in Iowa, I now live in Seattle. My parents met in South Dakota. During the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl many families left. My great uncle made his way west in 1939 with some of his hometown friends. Their destination was Anacortes, Washington, where they'd landed jobs building a log mill. My great uncle continued to Seattle, for a time living in the Greenlake neighborhood with a family from that same hometown.

Family Politics

Many in my family, at least on my paternal grandmother’s side, adored and supported George McGovern. One of her sisters even went to the 1972 Democratic Convention in San Francisco. She was a hardcore leftist and proud atheist.

The children worshipped their mother, my great-grandmother, who was a staunch Democrat. She imparted this and Methodism to her children, at least to three of the girls and this was passed on to further generations. Being from South Dakota also meant a certain devotion for George McGovern, one of their senators.

Mom’s mother was a Republican and she made her husband one, too. That tradition continued when Mom married my father. I, however, am neither Democrat nor Republican. Both major parties are pretty much worthless, in my opinion. But the history fascinates me. Why did people support Nixon and not McGovern?

The most violent group of people who ever lived?

The horse-riding Yamnaya used their huge height and muscular builds to brutally murder and invade their way across Europe more than four thousand years ago. They had nutritionally rich diets and were tall, muscular, and skilled horse riders. It is believed they exploited a continent recovering from disease and death. They spread rapidly, adapting, and massacring their way throughout Europe, slaughtering Neolithic men in a prehistoric genocide. They made their way to Britain and within a few generations. No genetic record remains of the previous inhabitants who built Stonehenge.

‘A common fallacy when writing about the past’

“In literary and historical analysis, presentism is a term for the introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Some modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter. The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.”